Food security is increasingly under threat worldwide, not due to natural shortages but through what appears to be a coordinated effort to control the global food supply. With prices skyrocketing and agricultural restrictions mounting, many experts are questioning whether these food shortages are being deliberately engineered as part of a larger agenda.
This article examines the evidence suggesting that food scarcity is being orchestrated by powerful interests and explores the potential consequences for humanity.
Historical Precedents of Food as a Weapon
To understand today’s food supply manipulation, we must first look at historical examples where food was weaponized against populations. One of the most devastating cases occurred in 1933 in the Soviet Union, where a manufactured famine targeted the Ukraine and other regions.
Soviet authorities deliberately sealed Ukraine’s borders, preventing food imports or people from escaping. This engineered famine resulted in approximately 10 million deaths over less than two years, including 7 million Ukrainians, with 3 million of them children. This historical tragedy demonstrates how controlling food access can be used as a tool for population control and subjugation.
Related: Global War on Plastics
The Current Attack on Agriculture
The Nitrogen Crisis
Today, similar control mechanisms are being implemented under different justifications. One primary target is nitrogen—an essential element for agricultural productivity and soil health.
In the Netherlands, government policies targeting nitrogen oxide have created what many Dutch farmers call a “manufactured crisis.” The only solution being proposed is the forced expropriation of farms. This pattern extends beyond Dutch borders:
Get instant dream insight with our Free Dream Interpretation App
- In Ireland, plans call for culling 200,000 cows over three years to meet climate goals
- In Germany, the government and German Nutritional Society have proposed limiting meat consumption to “one sausage per month”
- Similar restrictions are being implemented in Australia and Canada
The justification for these policies centers around claims that livestock, particularly cattle, produce emissions that harm the environment. Climate advisor John Kerry and others frequently cite cow breath and urination as significant contributors to climate change, despite considerable scientific debate on the actual impact.
Genetic Modification and Food Supply Control
Another concerning development is the widespread use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture. Critics point to several troubling aspects of GMO implementation:
Health Concerns
Research has raised significant questions about the safety of GMO foods. Professor Séralini conducted a landmark two-year study showing alarming results in animals fed GMO corn:
- 80% of test rats developed tumors
- Female rats experienced mammary tumors at rates 2-3 times higher than control groups
- Males showed significant damage to livers, kidneys, and digestive systems
- Hormonal balances were disrupted by both GMO corn and Roundup exposure
This study, published in the journal Food and Chemical Toxicology, faced intense industry pressure after publication.
Related: The War on Salt
Regulatory Capture
Perhaps most concerning is how GMO approval processes have been influenced by industry insiders:
- Michael Taylor, a former Monsanto attorney, was appointed to create FDA policy on GMOs
- Taylor later became Monsanto’s vice president before returning to government as Food Safety Czar
- Scientists at the FDA who raised safety concerns about GMOs were reportedly overruled by political appointees
- Former agriculture officials have stated they faced pressure not to question GMO regulatory frameworks
Contraceptive Corn and Population Control
Some GMO research has taken a more direct approach to population concerns. According to reports published in The Guardian over two decades ago, a biotechnology company called Episite developed “contraceptive corn” containing genes that produce antibodies attacking human sperm. This development aligns with stated goals to reduce global population.
The Pesticide Connection
The widespread use of pesticides, particularly glyphosate (the active ingredient in Roundup), has been linked to numerous health issues:
- Lee Johnson won a landmark $289 million judgment against Monsanto after developing an aggressive form of cancer linked to Roundup exposure
- Professor Séralini’s research demonstrated that rats exposed to glyphosate developed tumors at alarming rates
- Critics note that Monsanto (now owned by Bayer) has a troubling history of declaring products safe that were later proven harmful, including PCBs, Agent Orange, and DDT
The Stated Goal: Population Reduction
The transcript references statements from various global organizations suggesting that the ideal world population should be around 500 million people—a reduction of billions from current levels. This aligns with policies that appear designed to limit food production and availability.
Conclusion: Awareness and Action
Understanding these coordinated efforts to control the food supply is crucial for addressing them effectively. As food prices continue to rise and agricultural restrictions tighten globally, consumers need to be aware of the forces shaping food policy and availability.
By recognizing the historical patterns of food control and the current mechanisms being deployed, individuals can make more informed choices about food sovereignty, support independent farmers, and advocate for transparent agricultural policies that prioritize abundance rather than artificial scarcity.
The food supply challenges we face today aren’t simply the result of natural factors—they reflect deliberate policy choices with far-reaching consequences for human health, freedom, and survival.
NOTE: This article was generated from the video transcript and rewritten with the assistance of AI—see our AI Usage Disclosure for more information.
